Image Quality Comparison

Apply the images below to compare the iii bachelor visual quality settings and go a amend understanding of what sacrifices yous brand when going from high to medium and from medium to low presets.

The bigger differences from my perspective seem to be texture and lighting quality. For larger, more than detailed images click on whatsoever of the pictures for a 2560x1600 version of it.



Comparing the high and medium quality screenshots above practise not really give us many clues as to what is better most the high quality setting. The textures expect much the same, as does the lighting and particular levels. Possibly the only thing we've been able to spot is that on high quality in that location appears to be an improved draw altitude equally the trees in the groundwork appear to be more detailed.

However, when going from the medium to low at that place is a pregnant reduction in visual quality. The virtually noticeable difference tin exist seen in the trees which go from realistic looking copse to blobs. The lighting is also diminished, much of the detail is removed and the texture quality is very poor.



The biggest departure between the loftier and medium quality presets in the above screenshots tin be seen to the right of the full size images on the cliff face. Here nosotros have some rocks that jut out from the cliff confront and the high quality preset shows stronger more pronounced shadowing. Although this is a subtle difference it is the merely real difference we could spot.

When going from the high/medium settings to low, the water is no longer transparent and does not blend naturally with the shoreline. Shadows are gone along with most of the lighting and the texture quality is quite poor.